- PII
- S3034510325110093-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034510325110093
- Publication type
- Review
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 61 / Issue number 11
- Pages
- 85-93
- Abstract
- The review is devoted to advances in the creation of an artificial cell using synthetic biology methods. All achievements in this area are directly related not only to the possibility of answering the question of how life was created on this planet, but also impose great risks on the creation of objects that can be directed to the detriment of humanity or individual groups of people. Since modern technologies make it possible to synthesize the genomes of many organisms (bacteria and viruses) in vitro without complex equipment, only the moral and ethical qualities of the researcher, his foresight and deep study of the consequences of his actions can ensure the correct development of synthetic biology as a new and very promising science, without fear of possible negative consequences.
- Keywords
- синтетическая биология искусственная клетка микоплазма синтетический геном мораль
- Date of publication
- 01.11.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 30
References
- 1. Оссовская М. Рыцарь и буржуа. Исследования по истории морали. М.: Прогресс, 1987. 528 с.
- 2. Дольник В.Р. Непослушное дитя биосферы. Беседы о поведении человека в компании птиц, зверей и детей. М.: Издательство МЦНИО, 2016. 352 с.
- 3. Эфроимсон В.П. Генетика этики и эстетики. М.: Тайдекс Ко, 2004. 304 с.
- 4. Хаузер М. Мораль и разум. Как природа создавала наше универсальное чувство добра и зла / под ред. Александрова Ю.И. М.: Дрофа, 2008. 639 с.
- 5. Yus E., Maier T., Michalodimitrakis K. et al. Impact of genome reduction on bacterial metabolism and its regulation // Science. 2009. V. 326. № 5957. P. 1263–1268. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177263
- 6. Breuer M., Earnest T.M., Merryman C. et al. Essential metabolism for a minimal cell // eLife. 2019. V. 8. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36842
- 7. Morowitz H.J. The completeness of molecular biology // Israel J. Med. Sci. 1984. V. 20. P. 750–753.
- 8. Wilkins M., Pasquali C., Appel R. et al. From proteins to proteomes: Large scale protein identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and amino acid analysis // Nat. Biotechnol. 1996. V. 14. P. 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0196-61
- 9. Güell M., van Noort V., Yus E. et al. Transcriptome complexity in a genome-reduced bacterium // Science. 2009. V. 326. № 5957. P. 1268–1271. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176951
- 10. Gibson D.G., Glass J.I., Lartigue C. et al. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome // Science. 2010. V. 329. № 5987. P. 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190719
- 11. Hutchison C.A. 3rd, Chuang R.Y., Noskov V.N. et al. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome // Science. 2016. V. 351. № 6280. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6253
- 12. De C., Bittencourt D.M., Brown D.M., Assad-Garcia N. et al. Minimal bacterial cell JCVI-syn3B as a chassis to investigate interactions between bacteria and mammalian cells // ACS Synth. Biol. 2024. V. 13. № 4. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00513
- 13. Burgos R., Weber M., Martinez S. et al. Protein quality control and regulated proteolysis in the genome-reduced organism Mycoplasma pneumoniae // Mol. Syst. Biol. 2020. V. 16. № 1.
- 14. Karr J.R., Sanghvi J.C., Macklin D.N. et al. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype // Cell. 2012. V. 150. № 2. P. 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044
- 15. Maritan M., Autin L., Karr J. et al. Building structural models of a whole mycoplasma cell // J. Mol. Biol. 2022. V. 434. № 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167351
- 16. Fisunov G.Y., Zubov A.I., Pobeguts O.V. et al. The dynamics of Mycoplasma gallisepticum nucleoid structure at the exponential and stationary growth phases // Front. Microbiol. 2021. V. 18. № 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmich.2021.753760
- 17. Butenko I., Vanyushkina A., Pobeguts O. et al. Response induced in Mycoplasma gallisepticum under heat shock might be relevant to infection process // Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 7. № 1. P. 11330. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09237-7
- 18. Matyushkina D., Pobeguts O., Butenko I. et al. Phase transition of the bacterium upon invasion of a host cell as a mechanism of adaptation: A Mycoplasma gallisepticum model // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 24. № 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35959
- 19. Mazin P.V., Fisunov G.Y., Gorbachev A.Y. et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals novel regulatory mechanisms in a genome-reduced bacterium // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2014. V. 42. № 21. P. 13254–13268. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku976
- 20. Fisunov G.Y., Evsyutina D.V., Garanina I.A. et al. Ribosome profiling reveals an adaptation strategy of reduced bacterium to acute stress // Biochimie. 2017. V. 132. P. 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2016.10.015
- 21. Vanyushkina A.A., Fisunov G.Y., Gorbachev A.Y. et al. Metabolomic analysis of three Mollicute species // PLoS One. 2014. V. 9. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089312
- 22. Fisunov G.Y., Garanina I.A., Evsyutina D.V. et al. Reconstruction of transcription control networks in Mollicutes by high-throughput identification of promoters // Front. Microbiol. 2016. V. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmich.2016.01977
- 23. Maier T., Schmidt A., Güell M. et al. Quantification of mRNA and protein and integration with protein turnover in a bacterium // Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011. V. 7. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.38
- 24. Fisunov G.Y., Tsvetkov V.B., Tsoy E.A. et al. WniA transcription factor provides feedback loop between translation and energy production in a genome-reduced bacterium // Front. Microbiol. 2024. V. 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmich.2024.1504418
- 25. Alberti S., Gladfelter A., Mittag T. Considerations and challenges in studying liquid-liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates // Cell. 2019. V. 176. № 3. P. 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035
- 26. Ellis R.J. Macromolecular crowding: Obvious but underappreciated // Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001. V. 26. № 10. P. 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004 (01)01398-7
- 27. Kühner S., van Noort V., Betts M.J. et al. Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium // Science. 2009. V. 326. № 5957. P. 1235–1240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176343
- 28. Fredens J., Wang K., de la Torre D. et al. Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome // Nature. 2019. V. 569. P. 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1192-5
- 29. Venetz J.E., Del Medico L., Wolfle A. et al. Chemical synthesis rewriting of a bacterial genome to achieve design flexibility and biological functionality // PNAS USA. 2019. V. 116. № 16. P. 8070–8079. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818259116
- 30. Richardson S.M., Mitchell L.A., Straegiadario G. et al. Design of a synthetic yeast genome // Science. 2017. V. 355. № 6329. P. 1040–1044. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4557
- 31. Cello J., Paul A.V., Wimmer E. Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: Generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template // Science. 2002. V. 297. № 5583. P. 1016–1018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072266
- 32. Smith H.O., Hutchison C.A. 3rd, Pfannkoch C., Venter J.C. Generating a synthetic genome by whole genome assembly: PhIX174 bacteriophage from synthetic oligonucleotides // PNAS USA. 2003. V. 100. № 26. P. 15440–15445. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237126100
- 33. Фисунов Г.Ю., Семашко Т.А., Евсютина Д.В. и др. Chirres riconna бактериофага N4 // Пробл. особо опасных инфекций. 2024. Т. 1. С. 182–191. https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2024-1-182-191
- 34. Karim A.S., Brown D.M., Archuleta C.M. et al. Deconstructing synthetic biology across scales: A conceptual approach for training synthetic biologists // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. P. 5425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49626-x