References

1. 1. Kuznetsova K., Efremova E., Dodueva I. et al. Functional modules in the meristems: “Tinkering” in action // Plants. 2023. V. 12. № 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203661
2. 2. Tvorogova V.E., Krasnoperova E.Y., Potsenkovskaia E.A. et al. What does the WOX say? Review of regulators, targets, partners // Mol. Biol. (Mosk). 2021. V. 55. № 3. P. 362–391. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0026898421030174
3. 3. Whitewoods C.D. Evolution of CLE peptide signalling // Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021. V. 109. P. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.04.022
4. 4. Hirakawa Y. Evolution of meristem zonation by CLE gene duplication in land plants // Nat. Plants. 2022. V. 8. № 7. P. 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01199-7
5. 5. Schlegel J., Denay G., Wink R. et al. Control of Arabidopsis shoot stem cell homeostasis by two antagonistic CLE peptide signalling pathways // eLife. 2021. V. 13. № 10. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70934
6. 6. Pi L., Aichinger E., van der Graaff E. et al. Organizerderived WOX5 signal maintains root columella stem cells through chromatin-mediated repression of CDF4 expression // Dev. Cell. 2015. V. 33. № 5. P. 576–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.024
7. 7. Geng Y., Zhou Y. HAM gene family and shoot meristem development // Front. Plant Sci. 2021. V. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.800332
8. 8. Chandler J.W., Werr W. Cytokinin-auxin crosstalk in cell type specification // Trends Plant Sci. 2015. V. 20. № 5. P. 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.003
9. 9. Tanaka W., Ohmori Y., Ushijima T. et al. Axillary meristem formation in rice requires the WUSCHEL ortholog TILLERS ABSENT1 // The Plant Cell. 2015. V. 27. № 4. P. 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00074.
10. 10. Nicolas A., Laufs P. Meristem initiation and de novo stem cell formation // Front. Plant Sci. 2022. V. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.891228
11. 11. Tsukaya H. The leaf meristem enigma: The relationship between the plate meristem and the marginal meristem // Plant Cell. 2021. V. 33. № 10. P. 3194–3206. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab190
12. 12. Додуева И.Е., Ганчева М.С., Лебедева М.А., Творогова В.Е. Латеральные меристемы высших растений: фитогормональный и генетический контроль // Физиол. растений. 2014. V. 61. № 5. P. 611. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0015330314050066
13. 13. Bishopp A., Help H., El-Showk S. et al. A Mutually inhibitory interaction between auxin and cytokinin specifies vascular pattern in roots // Curr. Biol. Elsevier. 2011. V. 21. № 11. P. 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.017
14. 14. Schoof H., Lenhard M., Haecker A. et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes // Cell. 2000. V. 100. № 6. P. 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674 (00)80700-x
15. 15. Su Y.H., Zhou C., Li Y.J. et al. Integration of pluripotency pathways regulates stem cell maintenance in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem // PNAS USA. 2020. V. 117. № 36. P. 22561–22571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015248117
16. 16. Shimotohno A., Heidstra R., Blilou I. et al. Root stem cell niche organizer specification by molecular convergence of PLETHORA and SCARECROW transcription factor modules // Genes Dev. 2018. V. 32. № 15–16. P. 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.314096.118
17. 17. De Smet I. Lateral root initiation: One step at a time // New Phytol. 2012. V. 193. № 4. P. 867–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03996.x
18. 18. Dubrovsky J.G., Doerner P.W., Colón-Carmona A. et al. Pericycle cell proliferation and lateral root initiation inArabidopsis // Plant Physiol. 2000. V. 124. № 4. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1648
19. 19. Franssen H.J., Xiao T.T., Kulikova O. et al. Root developmental programs shape the Medicago truncatula nodule meristem // Development. 2015. V. 142. № 17. P. 2941–2950. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.120774
20. 20. Heidstra R., Yang W.C., Yalcin Y. et al. Ethylene provides positional information on cortical cell division but is not involved in Nod factor-induced root hair tip growth in rhizobium-legume interaction // Development. 1997. V. 124. № 9. P. 1781–1787. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.9.1781
21. 21. Baum S.F., Dubrovsky J.G., Rost T.L. Apical organization and maturation of the cortex and vascular cylinder in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) roots // Am J. Bot. 2002. V. 89. № 6. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.6.908
22. 22. Xiao W., Molina D., Wunderling A. et al. Pluripotent pericycle cells trigger different growth outputs by integrating developmental cues into distinct regulatory modules // Curr. Biol. 2020. V. 30. № 22. P. 4384–4398.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.053
23. 23. Atta R., Laurens L., Boucheron-Dubuisson E. et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro // Plant J. 2009. V. 57. № 4. P. 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03715.x
24. 24. Parizot B., Laplaze L., Ricaud L. et al. Diarch symmetry of the vascular bundle in Arabidopsis root encompasses the pericycle and is reflected in distich lateral root initiation // Plant Physiol. 2008. V. 146. № 1. P. 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.107870
25. 25. De Rybel B., Vassileva V., Parizot B. et al. A novel aux/ IAA28 signaling cascade activates GATA23-dependent specification of lateral root founder cell identity // Curr. Biol. 2010. V. 20. № 19. P. 1697–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.007
26. 26. Goh T., Joi S., Mimura T. et al. The establishment of asymmetry in Arabidopsis lateral root founder cells is regulated by LBD16/ASL18 and related LBD/ ASL proteins // Development. 2012. V. 139. № 5. P. 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.071928
27. 27. Ruzicka K., Simásková M., Duclercq J. et al. Cytokinin regulates root meristem activity via modulation of the polar auxin transport // PNAS USA. 2009. V. 106. № 11. P. 4284–4289. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900060106
28. 28. Stahl Y., Wink R.H., Ingram G.C., Simon R. A signaling module controlling the stem cell niche in Arabidopsis root meristems // Curr. Biol. 2009. V. 19. № 11. P. 909–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.060
29. 29. Gonzali S., Novi G., Loreti E. et al. A turanoseinsensitive mutant suggests a role for WOX5 in auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana // Plant J. 2005. V. 44. № 4. P. 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02555.x
30. 30. Hu X., Xu L. Transcription factors WOX11/12 directly activate WOX5/7 to promote root primordia initiation and oganogenesis // Plant Physiol. 2016. V. 172. № 4. P. 2363–2373. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01067
31. 31. Aliaga Fandino A.C., Kim H., Rademaker J.D., Lee J.Y. Reprogramming of the cambium regulators during adventitious root development upon wounding of storage tap roots in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) // Biol. Open. 2019. V. 8. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.039677
32. 32. Zhang T., Ge Y., Cai G. et al. WOX-ARF modules initiate different types of roots // Cell Rep. 2023. V. 42. № 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112966
33. 33. Fischer U., Kucukoglu M., Helariutta Y., Bhalerao R.P. The dynamics of cambial stem cell activity // Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019. V. 70. P. 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100402
34. 34. Smetana O., Mäkilä R., Lyu M. et al. High levels of auxin signalling define the stem-cell organizer of the vascular cambium // Nature. 2019. V. 565. № 7740. P. 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0837-0
35. 35. Zhang Y., Umeda M., Kakimoto T. Pericycle cell division competence underlies various developmental programs // Plant Biotechnol. (Tokyo). 2022. V. 39. № 1. P. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.1202a
36. 36. Sugimoto K., Jiao Y., Meyerowitz E.M. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway // Dev. Cell. 2010. V. 18. № 3. P. 463–471.
37. 37. Tanaka H., Hashimoto N., Kawai S. et al. Auxin-induced WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX13 mediates asymmetric activity of callus formation uponcutting // Plant Cell Physiol. 2023. V. 64. № 3. P. 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcac146
38. 38. Ogura N., Sasagawa Y., Ito T. et al. WUSCHELRELATED HOMEOBOX 13 suppresses de novo shoot regeneration via cell fate control of pluripotent callus // Sci. Adv. 2023. V. 9. № 27. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6983
39. 39. Su Y.H., Zhao X.Y., Liu Y.B. et al. Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis // Plant J. 2009. V. 59. № 3. P. 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03880.x
40. 40. Krasnoperova E.Y., Tvorogova V.E., Smirnov K.V. et al. MtWOX2 and MtWOX9-1 effects on the embryogenic callus transcriptome in Medicago truncatula // Plants (Basel). 2023. V. 13. № 1. P. 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010102
41. 41. Zhang Y., Chen X., Wei G. et al. The WOX9-WUS modules are indispensable for the maintenance of stem cell homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana // Plant J. 2024. V. 120. № 3. P. 910–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.17024
42. 42. Dodueva I.E., Lebedeva M.A., Kuznetsova K.A. et al. Plant tumors: A hundred years of study // Planta. 2020. V. 251. № 4. P. 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03375-5
43. 43. De Buck S., De Wilde C., Van Montagu M., Depicker A. Determination of the T-DNA transfer and the T-DNA integration frequencies upon cocultivation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants // Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. 2000. V. 13. № 6. P. 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.6.658
44. 44. Guo X., Wang J., Gardner M. et al. Identification of cyst nematode B-type CLE peptides and modulation of the vascular stem cell pathway for feeding cell formation // PLoS Pathog. 2017. V. 13. № 2. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006142
45. 45. Dodueva I., Lebedeva M., Lutova L. Dialog between kingdoms: Enemies, allies and peptide phytohormones // Plants (Basel). 2021. V. 10. № 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112243.
46. 46. Miyashima S., Sebastian J., Lee J.Y., Helariutta Y. Stem cell function during plant vascular development // EMBO J. 2013. V. 32. № 2. P. 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.301
47. 47. Osipova M.A., Mortier V., Demchenko K.N. et al. Wuschel-related homeobox5 gene expression and interaction of CLE peptides with components of the systemic control add two pieces to the puzzle of autoregulation of nodulation // Plant Physiol. 2012. V. 158. № 3. P. 1329–1341. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.188078
48. 48. Lebedeva-Osipova M.A., Tvorogova V.E., Vinogradova A.P. et al. Initiation of spontaneous tumors i radish (Raphanus sativus): Cellular, molecular and physiological events // J. Plant Physiol. 2015. V. 173. P. 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.07.030
49. 49. Libbenga K.R., van Iren F., Bogers R.J., SchraagLamers M.F. The role of hormones and gradients in the initiation of cortex proliferation and nodule formation in Pisum sativum L // Planta. 1973. V. 114. № 1. P. 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390282
50. 50. Heckmann A.B., Sandal N., Bek A.S. et al. Cytokinin induction of root nodule primordia in Lotus japonicus is regulated by a mechanism operating in the root cortex // Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011. V. 24. № 11. P. 1385–1395. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-05-11-0142
51. 51. Matveeva T.V., Frolova N.V., Smets R. et al. Hormonal control of tumor formation in radish // J. Plant Growth Regul. 2004. V. 23. P. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-004-0004-8.
52. 52. Tkachenko A., Dodueva I., Tvorogova V. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) spontaneous tumor // Plants (Basel). 2021. V. 10. № 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050919.
53. 53. Кузнецова К.А., Додуева И.Е., Лутова Л.А. Взаимодействие гомеодомена транскрипционного фактора WOX4 Raphanus sativus с промотором гена биосинтеза цитокининов LOG3 // Экол. генетика. 2024. Т. 22. № 1. С. 33–46. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen624893
54. 54. Kuznetsova X., Dodueva I., Afonin A. et al. Wholegenome sequencing and analysis of tumour-forming radish (Raphanus sativus L.) line // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024. V. 25. № 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116236
55. 55. Ferguson B.J., Indrasumunar A., Hayashi S. et al. Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation // J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010. V. 52. № 1. P. 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00899.x
56. 56. Rahimlou S., Bahram M., Tedersoo L. Phylogenomics reveals the evolution of root nodulating alpha- and beta-proteobacteria (Rhizobia) // Microbiol. Res. 2021. V. 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126788
57. 57. Op den Camp R., Streng A., De Mita S. et al. LysMtype mycorrhizal receptor recruited for rhizobium symbiosis in nonlegume Parasponia // Science. 2011. V. 331. № 6019. P. 909–912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198181
58. 58. Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic perspectives on the origins of nodulation // Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011. V. 24. № 11. P. 1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-05-11-0114
59. 59. Lebedeva M., Azarakhsh M., Sadikova D., Lutova L. At the root of nodule organogenesis: Conserved regulatory pathways recruited by Rhizobia // Plants (Basel). 2021. V. 10. № 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122654
60. 60. Liu J., Bisseling T. Evolution of NIN and NIN-like genes in relation to nodule symbiosis: 7 // Genes (Basel). 2020. V. 11. № 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11070777
61. 61. Konishi M., Yanagisawa S. Arabidopsis NIN-like transcription factors have a central role in nitrate signalling // Nat. Commun. 2013. V. 4. P. 1617. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2621
62. 62. Suzuki W., Konishi M., Yanagisawa S. The evolutionary events necessary for the emergence of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes may involve a loss of nitrate responsiveness of the NIN transcription factor // Plant Signal. Behav. 2013. V. 8. № 10. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.25975
63. 63. Liu C.-W., Breakspear A., Guan D. et al. NIN Acts as a network hub controlling a growth module required for rhizobial infection // Plant Physiol. 2019. V. 179. № 4. P. 1704–1722. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01572
64. 64. Xie F., Murray J.D., Kim J. et al. Legume pectate lyase required for root infection by rhizobia // PNAS USA. 2012. V. 109. № 2. P. 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113992109
65. 65. Soyano T., Kouchi H., Hirota A., Hayashi M. Nodule inception directly targets NF-Y subunit genes to regulate essential processes of root nodule development in Lotus japonicus // PLoS Genet. 2013. V. 9. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003352
66. 66. Laporte P., Lepage A., Fournier J. et al. The CCAAT box-binding transcription factor NF-YA1 controls rhizobial infection // J. Exp. Bot. 2014. V. 65. № 2. P. 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert392
67. 67. Soyano T., Shimoda Y., Kawaguchi M. et al. A shared gene drives lateral root development and root nodule symbiosis pathways in Lotus // Science. 2019. V. 366. № 6468. P. 1021–1023. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2153
68. 68. Schiessl K., Lilley J.L.S., Lee T. et al. NODULE INCEPTION recruits the lateral root developmental program for symbiotic nodule organogenesis in Medicago truncatula // Curr. Biol. 2019. V. 29. № 21. P. 3657–3668.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.005
69. 69. Sarkar A.K., Luijten M., Miyashima S. et al. Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers // Nature. 2007. V. 446. № 7137. P. 811–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05703
70. 70. Chen S.-K., Kurdyukov S., Kereszt A. et al. The association of homeobox gene expression with stem cell formation and morphogenesis in cultured Medicago truncatula // Planta. 2009. V. 230. № 4. P. 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-009-0988-1
71. 71. Aida M., Beis D., Heidstra R. et al. The PLETHORA genes mediate patterning of the Arabidopsis root stem cell niche // Cell. 2004. V. 119. № 1. P. 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.018
72. 72. Du Y., Scheres B. PLETHORA transcription factors orchestrate de novo organ patterning during Arabidopsis lateral root outgrowth // PNAS USA. 2017. V. 114. № 44. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714410114
73. 73. Benfey P.N., Linstead P.J., Roberts K. et al. Root development in Arabidopsis: Four mutants with dramatically altered root morphogenesis // Development. 1993. V. 119. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119.Supplement.57
74. 74. Lucas M., Swarup R., Paponov I.A. et al. Short-root regulates primary, lateral, and adventitious root development in Arabidopsis // Plant Physiol. 2011. V. 155. № 1. P. 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.165126
75. 75. Couzigou J.-M., Mondy S., Sahl L. et al. To be or noot to be: Evolutionary tinkering for symbiotic organ identity // Plant Signal. Behav. 2013. V. 8. № 8. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.24969.
76. 76. Franssen H.J., Xiao T.T., Kulikova O. et al. Root developmental programs shape the Medicago truncatula nodule meristem // Development. 2015. V. 142. № 17. P. 2941–2950. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.120774
77. 77. Magne K., George J., Berbel Tornero A. et al. Lotus japonicus NOOT-BOP-COCH-LIKE1 is essential for nodule, nectary, leaf and flower development // Plant J. 2018. V. 94. № 5. P. 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13905
78. 78. Magne K., Couzigou J.M., Schiessl K. et al. MtNODULE ROOT1 and MtNODULE ROOT2 are essential for indeterminate nodule identity // Plant Physiol. 2018. V. 178. № 1. P. 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00610
79. 79. Hepworth S.R., Pautot V.A. Beyond the divide: Boundaries for patterning and stem cell regulation in plants // Front. Plant Sci. 2015. V. 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01052
80. 80. Azarakhsh M., Lebedeva M.A. Lateral root versus nodule: The auxin-cytokinin interplay // J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023. V. 42. P. 6903–6919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10983-4
81. 81. Tirichine L., Sandal N., Madsen L.H. et al. A gainof-function mutation in a cytokinin receptor triggers spontaneous root nodule organogenesis // Science. 2007. V. 315. № 5808. P. 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132397
82. 82. Gauthier-Coles C., White R.G., Mathesius U. Nodulating legumes are distinguished by a sensitivity to cytokinin in the root cortex leading to pseudonodule development // Front. Plant Sci. 2019. V. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01901. eCollection 2018
83. 83. Dong W., Zhu Y., Chang H. et al. An SHR–SCR module specifies legume cortical cell fate to enable nodulation // Nature. 2021. V. 589. № 7843. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3016-z
84. 84. Van Zeijl A., den Camp R.H.M.O., Deinum E.E. et al. Rhizobium lipo-chitooligosaccharide signaling triggers accumulation of cytokinins in Medicago truncatula roots // Mol. Plant. 2015. V. 8. № 8. P. 1213–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.010
85. 85. Jardinaud M.-F., Boivin S., Rodde N. et al. A laser dissection-RNAseq analysis highlights the activation of cytokinin pathways by Nod factors in the Medicago truncatula root epidermis // Plant Physiol. 2016. V. 171. № 3. P. 2256–2276. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00711
86. 86. Reid D., Nadzieja M., Novák O. et al. Cytokinin biosynthesis promotes cortical cell responses during nodule development // Plant Physiol. 2017. V. 175. № 1. P. 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00832
87. 87. Azarakhsh M., Rumyantsev A.M., Lebedeva M.A., Lutova L.A. Cytokinin biosynthesis genes expressed during nodule organogenesis are directly regulated by the KNOX3 protein in Medicago truncatula // PloS One. 2020. V. 15. № 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232352
88. 88. Azarakhsh M., Kirienko A.N., Zhukov V.A. et al. KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX 3: A new regulator of symbiotic nodule development // J. Exp. Bot. 2015. V. 66. № 22. P. 7181–7195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv414
89. 89. Jasinski S., Piazza P., Craft J. et al. KNOX action in Arabidopsis is mediated by coordinate regulation of cytokinin and gibberellin activities // Curr. Biol. 2005. V. 15. № 17. P. 1560–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.023
90. 90. Yanai O., Shani E., Dolezal K. et al. Arabidopsis KNOXI proteins activate cytokinin biosynthesis // Curr. Biol. 2005. V. 15. № 17. P. 1566–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.060
91. 91. Searle I.R., Men A.E., Laniya T.S. et al. Long-distance signaling in nodulation directed by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase // Science. 2003. V. 299. № 5603. P. 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1077937
92. 92. Nishimura R., Hayashi M., Wu G.J. et al. HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development // Nature. 2002. V. 420. № 6914. P. 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01231
93. 93. Schnabel E., Journet E.-P., de Carvalho-Niebel F. et al. The Medicago truncatula SUNN gene encodes a CLV1-like leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase that regulates nodule number and root length // Plant Mol. Biol. 2005. V. 58. № 6. P. 809–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-8102-y
94. 94. Soyano T., Hirakawa H., Sato S. et al. NODULE INCEPTION creates a long-distance negative feedback loop involved in homeostatic regulation of nodule organ production // PNAS USA. 2014. V. 111. № 40. P. 14607–14612. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412716111
95. 95. Laffont C., Ivanovici A., Gautrat P. et al. The NIN transcription factor coordinates CEP and CLE signaling peptides that regulate nodulation antagonistically // Nat. Commun. 2020. V. 11. № 1. P. 3167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16968-1
96. 96. Lebedeva M., Azarakhsh M., Yashenkova Y., Lutova L. Nitrate-induced CLE peptide systemically inhibits nodulation in Medicago truncatula // Plants. 2020. V. 9. № 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111456
97. 97. Lebedeva M.A., Dobychkina D.A., Yashenkova Ya.S. et al. Local and systemic targets of the MtCLE35-SUNN pathway in the roots of Medicago truncatula // J. Plant. Physiol. 2023. V. 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2023.153922
98. 98. Lebedeva M.A., Dobychkina D.A., Bashtovenko K. et al. MtCLE35 mediates inhibition of rhizobiainduced signaling pathway and upregulation of defense-related genes in rhizobia-inoculated Medicago truncatula roots // J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024. V. 43. № 12. P. 4941–4956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11448-y
99. 99. Luo Z., Lin J.-S., Zhu Y. et al. NLP1 reciprocally regulates nitrate inhibition of nodulation through SUNN-CRA2 signaling in Medicago truncatula // Plant Commun. 2021. V. 2. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100183
100. 100. Zhong X., Wang J., Shi X. et al. Genetically optimizing soybean nodulation improves yield and protein content // Nat. Plants. 2024. V. 10. № 5. P. 736–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01696-x
101. 101. Lebedeva M.A., Dobychkina D.A., Lutova L.A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-out of the MtCLE35 gene highlights its key role in the control of symbiotic nodule numbers under high-nitrate conditions // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023. V. 24. № 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316816