Библиография

1. 1. Nasir A., Romero-Severson E., Claverie J.M. Investigating the concept and origin of viruses // Trends Microbiol. 2020. V. 28. № 12. P. 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.08.003
2. 2. Georjon H., Bernheim A. The highly diverse antiphage defence systems of bacteria // Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023. V. 21. № 10. P. 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00934-x
3. 3. Martinez M., Rizzuto I., Molina R. Knowing our enemy in the antimicrobial resistance era: Dissecting the molecular basis of bacterial defense systems // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024. V. 25. № 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094929
4. 4. Isaev A.B., Musharova O.S., Severinov K.V. Microbial arsenal of antiviral defenses. Part II // Biochemistry (Moscow). 2021. V. 86. № 4. P. 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297921040064
5. 5. Isaev A.B., Musharova O.S., Severinov K.V. Microbial arsenal of antiviral defenses – part I//Biochemistry (Moscow). 2021. V. 86. № 3. P. 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297921030081
6. 6. Agapov A., Baker K.S., Bedekar P. et al. Multi-layered genome defences in bacteria // Curr. Opin Microbiol. 2024. V. 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2024.102436
7. 7. Bernheim A., Sorek R. The pan-immune system of bacteria: Antiviral defence as a community resource // Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020. V. 18. № 2. P. 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0278-2
8. 8. Beavogui A., Lacroix A., Wiart N. et al. The defensome of complex bacterial communities // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. № 1. P. 2146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46489-0
9. 9. Morehouse B.R. Phage defense origin of animal immunity // Curr. Opin Microbiol. 2023. V. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102295
10. 10. Bernheim A., Cury J., Poirier E.Z. The immune modules conserved across the tree of life: Towards a definition of ancestral immunity // PLoS Biol. 2024. V. 22. № 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002717
11. 11. Van den Berg D.F., Costa A.R., Esser J.Q. et al. Bacterial homologs of innate eukaryotic antiviral defenses with anti-phage activity highlight shared evolutionary roots of viral defenses // Cell Host Microbe. 2024. V. 32. № 8. P. 1427–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2024.07.007
12. 12. Gao L., Altae-Tran H., Bohning F. et al. Diverse enzymatic activities mediate antiviral immunity in prokaryotes // Science. 2020. V. 369. № 6507. P. 1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba0372
13. 13. Millman A., Melamed S., Leavitt A. et al. An expanded arsenal of immune systems that protect bacteria from phages // Cell Host Microbe. 2022. V. 30. № 11. P. 1556–1569 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.017
14. 14. Doron S., Melamed S., Ofir G. et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome // Science. 2018. V. 359. № 6379. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4120
15. 15. Baca C.F., Marraffini L.A. Nucleic acid recognition during prokaryotic immunity // Mol. Cell. 2025. V. 85. № 2. P. 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2024.12.007
16. 16. Vassallo C.N., Doering C.R., Littlehale M.L. et al. A functional selection reveals previously undetected antiphage defence systems in the E. coli pangenome // Nat. Microbiol. 2022. V. 7. № 10. P. 1568–1579. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01219-4
17. 17. Mayo-Munoz D., Pinilla-Redondo R., Birkholz N. et al. A host of armor: Prokaryotic immune strategies against mobile genetic elements // Cell Rep. 2023. V. 42. № 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112672
18. 18. Ledvina H.E., Whiteley A.T. Conservation and similarity of bacterial and eukaryotic innate immunity // Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024. V. 22. № 7. P. 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01017-1
19. 19. Faure G., Saito M., Wilkinson M.E. et al. TIGR-Tas: A family of modular RNA-guided DNA-targeting systems in prokaryotes and their viruses // Science. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adv9789
20. 20. Altae-Tran H., Kannan S., Suberski A.J. et al. Uncovering the functional diversity of rare CRISPRCas systems with deep terascale clustering // Science. 2023. V. 382. № 6673. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1910
21. 21. Boyle T.A., Hatoum-Aslan A. Recurring and emerging themes in prokaryotic innate immunity // Curr. Opin Microbiol. 2023. V. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102324
22. 22. Rostol J.T., Marraffini L. (Ph)ighting phages: How bacteria resist their parasites // Cell Host Microbe. 2019. V. 25. № 2. P. 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.009
23. 23. Stokar-Avihail A., Fedorenko T., Hor J. et al. Discovery of phage determinants that confer sensitivity to bacterial immune systems // Cell. 2023. V. 186. № 9. P. 1863–1876 e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.029
24. 24. Kibby E.M., Conte A.N., Burroughs A.M. et al. Bacterial NLR-related proteins protect against phage // Cell. 2023. V. 186. № 11. P. 2410–2424 e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.015
25. 25. Gao L.A., Wilkinson M.E., Strecker J. et al. Prokaryotic innate immunity through pattern recognition of conserved viral proteins // Science. 2022. V. 377. № 6607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm4096
26. 26. Burroughs A.M., Zhang D., Schaffer D.E. et al. Comparative genomic analyses reveal a vast, novel network of nucleotide-centric systems in biological conflicts, immunity and signaling // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2015. V. 43. № 22. P. 10633–10654. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1267
27. 27. Ye Q., Lau R.K., Mathews I.T. et al. HORMA domain proteins and a trip13-like ATPase regulate bacterial cGAS-like enzymes to mediate bacteriophage immunity // Mol. Cell. 2020. V. 77. № 4. P. 709–722 e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.009
28. 28. Pradhan B., Deep A., Konig J. et al. Loop-extrusionmediated plasmid DNA cleavage by the bacterial SMC Wadjet complex // Mol. Cell. 2025. V. 85. № 1. P. 107–116 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2024.11.002
29. 29. Roisné-Hamelin F., Liu H.W., Gruber S. Structure of a type II SMC Wadjet complex from Neobacillus vireti // bioRxiv. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.10.642339.
30. 30. Gu Y., Li H., Deep A. et al. Bacterial Shedu immune nucleases share a common enzymatic core regulated by diverse sensor domains // Mol. Cell. 2025. V. 85. № 3. P. 523–536 e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2024.12.004
31. 31. Loeff L., Walter A., Rosalen G.T. et al. DNA end sensing and cleavage by the Shedu anti-phage defense system // Cell. 2025. V. 188. № 3. P. 721–733 e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.030
32. 32. Hu H., Popp P.F., Hughes T.C.D. et al. Structure and mechanism of the Zorya anti-phage defence system // Nature. 2025. V. 639. № 8056. P. 1093–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08493-8
33. 33. Athukoralage J.S., White M.F. Cyclic nucleotide signaling in phage defense and counter-defense // Annu. Rev. Virol. 2022. V. 9. № 1. P. 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-100120-010228
34. 34. Hobbs S.J., Kranzusch P.J. Nucleotide immune signaling in CBASS, Pycsar, Thoeris, and CRISPR antiphage defense // Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2024. V. 78. № 1. P. 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-041222-024843
35. 35. Rousset F., Sorek R. The evolutionary success of regulated cell death in bacterial immunity // Curr. Opin Microbiol. 2023. V. 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102312
36. 36. Lopatina A., Tal N., Sorek R. Abortive Infection: Bacterial suicide as an antiviral immune strategy // Annu. Rev. Virol. 2020. V. 7. № 1. P. 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-011620-040628
37. 37. Wang L., Zhang L. The arms race between bacteria CBASS and bacteriophages // Front. Immunol. 2023. V. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1224341
38. 38. Millman A., Bernheim A., Stokar-Avihail A. et al. Bacterial retrons function in anti-phage defense // Cell. 2020. V. 183. № 6. P. 1551–1561. e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.065
39. 39. Fineran P.C., Blower T.R., Foulds I.J. et al. The phage abortive infection system, ToxIN, functions as a protein-RNA toxin-antitoxin pair // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009. V. 106. № 3. P. 894–899. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808832106
40. 40. LeRoux M., Laub M.T. Toxin-antitoxin systems as phage defense elements // Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2022. V. 76. P. 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-020722-013730
41. 41. Carabias A., Camara-Wilpert S., Mestre M.R. et al. Retron-Eco1 assembles NAD(+)-hydrolyzing filaments that provide immunity against bacteriophages // Mol. Cell. 2024. V. 84. № 11. P. 2185–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2024.05.001
42. 42. Hogrel G., Guild A., Graham S. et al. Cyclic nucleotideinduced helical structure activates a TIR immune effector // Nature. 2022. V. 608. № 7924. P. 808–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05070-9
43. 43. Tamulaitiene G., Sabonis D., Sasnauskas G. et al. Activation of Thoeris antiviral system via SIR2 effector filament assembly // Nature. 2024. V. 627. № 8003. P. 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07092-x
44. 44. Essuman K., Milbrandt J., Dangl J.L. et al. Shared TIR enzymatic functions regulate cell death and immunity across the tree of life // Science. 2022. V. 377. № 6605. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo0001
45. 45. Wang S., Kuang S., Song H. et al. The role of TIR domain-containing proteins in bacterial defense against phages // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. № 1. P. 7384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51738-3
46. 46. Marmorstein R. Structure and chemistry of the Sir2 family of NAD+-dependent histone/protein deactylases // Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2004. V. 32. Pt 6. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0320904
47. 47. Ofir G., Herbst E., Baroz M. et al. Antiviral activity of bacterial TIR domains via immune signalling molecules // Nature. 2021. V. 600. № 7887. P. 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04098-7
48. 48. Shen Z., Lin Q., Yang X.Y. et al. Assembly-mediated activation of the SIR2-HerA supramolecular complex for anti-phage defense // Mol. Cell. 2023. V. 83. № 24. P. 4586–4599 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.007
49. 49. Tang D., Chen Y., Chen H. et al. Multiple enzymatic activities of a Sir2-HerA system cooperate for antiphage defense // Mol. Cell. 2023. V. 83. № 24. P. 4600–4613 e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.010
50. 50. Garb J., Lopatina A., Bernheim A. et al. Multiple phage resistance systems inhibit infection via SIR2-dependent NAD(+) depletion // Nat. Microbiol. 2022. V. 7. № 11. P. 1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01207-8
51. 51. Li Y., Shen Z., Zhang M. et al. PtuA and PtuB assemble into an inf lammasome-like oligomer for anti-phage defense // Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2024. V. 31. № 3. P. 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01172-8
52. 52. Antine S.P., Johnson A.G., Mooney S.E. et al. Structural basis of Gabija anti-phage defence and viral immune evasion // Nature. 2024. V. 625. № 7994. P. 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06855-2
53. 53. Li J., Cheng R., Wang Z. et al. Structures and activation mechanism of the Gabija anti-phage system // Nature. 2024. V. 629. № 8011. P. 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07270-x
54. 54. Tuck O.T., Adler B.A., Armbruster E.G. et al. Genome integrity sensing by the broad-spectrum Hachiman antiphage defense complex // Cell. 2024. V. 187. № 24. P. 6914–6928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.020
55. 55. Robins W.P., Meader B.T., Toska J. et al. DdmABCdependent death triggered by viral palindromic DNA sequences // Cell Rep. 2024. V. 43. № 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114450
56. 56. Patel D.J., Yu Y., Jia N. Bacterial origins of cyclic nucleotide-activated antiviral immune signaling // Mol. Cell. 2022. V. 82. № 24. P. 4591–4610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.11.006
57. 57. Burman N., Belukhina S., Depardieu F. et al. A virally encoded tRNA neutralizes the PARIS antiviral defence system // Nature. 2024. V. 634. № 8033. P. 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07874-3
58. 58. Stella G., Marraffini L. Type III CRISPR-Cas: beyond the Cas10 effector complex // Trends Biochem. Sci. 2024. V. 49. № 1. P. 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2023.10.006
59. 59. Duncan-Lowey B., Tal N., Johnson A.G. et al. CryoEM structure of the RADAR supramolecular antiphage defense complex // Cell. 2023. V. 186. № 5. P. 987–998 e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.012
60. 60. Gao Y., Luo X., Li P. et al. Molecular basis of RADAR anti-phage supramolecular assemblies // Cell. 2023. V. 186. № 5. P. 999–1012 e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.026
61. 61. Rousset F., Yirmiya E., Nesher S. et al. A conserved family of immune effectors cleaves cellular ATP upon viral infection // Cell. 2023. V. 186. № 17. P. 3619–3631 e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.020
62. 62. Hsueh B.Y., Severin G.B., Elg C.A. et al. Phage defence by deaminase-mediated depletion of deoxynucleotides in bacteria // Nat. Microbiol. 2022. V. 7. № 8. P. 1210–1220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01162-4
63. 63. Tal N., Millman A., Stokar-Avihail A. et al. Bacteria deplete deoxynucleotides to defend against bacteriophage infection // Nat. Microbiol. 2022. V. 7. № 8. P. 1200–1209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01158-0
64. 64. Duncan-Lowey B., Kranzusch P.J. CBASS phage defense and evolution of antiviral nucleotide signaling // Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2022. V. 74. P. 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2022.01.002
65. 65. Shi Y., Masic V., Mosaiab T. et al. Structural characterization of macro domain-containing Thoeris antiphage defense systems // Sci. Adv. 2024. V. 10. № 26. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn3310
66. 66. Tal N., Morehouse B.R., Millman A. et al. Cyclic CMP and cyclic UMP mediate bacterial immunity against phages // Cell. 2021. V. 184. № 23. P. 5728–5739 e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.031
67. 67. Rousset F., Osterman I., Scherf T. et al. TIR signaling activates caspase-like immunity in bacteria // Science. 2025. V. 387. № 6733. P. 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu2262
68. 68. Johnson A.G., Mayer M.L., Schaefer S.L. et al. Structure and assembly of a bacterial gasdermin pore // Nature. 2024. V. 628. № 8008. P. 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07216-3
69. 69. Johnson A.G., Wein T., Mayer M.L. et al. Bacterial gasdermins reveal an ancient mechanism of cell death // Science. 2022. V. 375. № 6577. P. 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj8432
70. 70. Steens J.A., Bravo J.P.K., Salazar C.R.P. et al. Type III-B CRISPR-Cas cascade of proteolytic cleavages // Science. 2024. V. 383. № 6682. P. 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk0378
71. 71. Ozcan A., Krajeski R., Ioannidi E. et al. Programmable RNA targeting with the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11 // Nature. 2021. V. 597. № 7878. P. 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03886-5
72. 72. Van Beljouw S.P.B., Haagsma A.C., Rodriguez-Molina A. et al. The gRAMP CRISPR-Cas effector is an RNA endonuclease complexed with a caspase-like peptidase // Science. 2021. V. 373. № 6561. P. 1349–1353. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2718
73. 73. Hu C., van Beljouw S.P.B., Nam K.H. et al. Craspase is a CRISPR RNA-guided, RNA-activated protease // Science. 2022. V. 377. № 6612. P. 1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add5064
74. 74. Banh D.V., Roberts C.G., Morales-Amador A. et al. Bacterial cGAS senses a viral RNA to initiate immunity // Nature. 2023. V. 623. № 7989. P. 1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06743-9
75. 75. Lau R.K., Ye Q., Birkholz E.A. et al. Structure and mechanism of a cyclic trinucleotide-activated bacterial endonuclease mediating bacteriophage immunity // Mol. Cell. 2020. V. 77. № 4. P. 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.010
76. 76. Severin G.B., Ramliden M.S., Hawver L.A. et al. Direct activation of a phospholipase by cyclic GMP-AMP in El Tor Vibrio cholerae // PNAS USA. 2018. V. 115. № 26. P. E6048–E6055. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801233115
77. 77. Lowey B., Whiteley A.T., Keszei A.F.A. et al. CBASS immunity uses CARF-related effectors to sense 3'- 5'- and 2'-5'-linked cyclic oligonucleotide signals and protect bacteria from phage infection // Cell. 2020. V. 182. № 1. P. 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.019
78. 78. Morehouse B.R., Govande A.A., Millman A. et al. STING cyclic dinucleotide sensing originated in bacteria // Nature. 2020. V. 586. № 7829. P. 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2719-5
79. 79. Duncan-Lowey B., McNamara-Bordewick N.K., Tal N. et al. Effector-mediated membrane disruption controls cell death in CBASS antiphage defense // Mol. Cell. 2021. V. 81. № 24. P. 5039–5051 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.020
80. 80. Jenson J.M., Li T., Du F. et al. Ubiquitin-like conjugation by bacterial cGAS enhances anti-phage defence // Nature. 2023. V. 616. № 7956. P. 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05862-7
81. 81. Yan Y., Xiao J., Huang F. et al. Phage defence system CBASS is regulated by a prokaryotic E2 enzyme that imitates the ubiquitin pathway // Nat. Microbiol. 2024. V. 9. № 6. P. 1566–1578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-024-01684-z
82. 82. Kibby E.M., Robbins L.K., Deep A. et al. A bacterial NLR-related protein recognizes multiple unrelated phage triggers to sense infection // bioRxiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.17.629029.
83. 83. Wang Y., Tian Y., Yang X. et al. Filamentation activates bacterial Avs5 antiviral protein // Nat. Commun. 2025. V. 16. № 1. P. 2408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57732-7
84. 84. Bobonis J., Mitosch K., Mateus A. et al. Bacterial retrons encode phage-defending tripartite toxinantitoxin systems // Nature. 2022. V. 609. № 7925. P. 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05091-4
85. 85. Wang Y., Guan Z., Wang C. et al. Cryo-EM structures of Escherichia coli Ec86 retron complexes reveal architecture and defence mechanism // Nat. Microbiol. 2022. V. 7. № 9. P. 1480–1489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01197-7
86. 86. Wang Y., Wang C., Guan Z. et al. DNA methylation activates retron Ec86 filaments for antiphage defense // Cell Rep. 2024. V. 43. № 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114857
87. 87. Mestre M.R., Gonzalez-Delgado A., Gutierrez-Rus L.I. et al. Systematic prediction of genes functionally associated with bacterial retrons and classification of the encoded tripartite systems // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2020. V. 48. № 22. P. 12632–12647. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1149
88. 88. Bobadilla Ugarte P., Barendse P., Swarts D.C. Argonaute proteins confer immunity in all domains of life // Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023. V. 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102313
89. 89. Burroughs A.M., Ando Y., Aravind L. New perspectives on the diversification of the RNA interference system: Insights from comparative genomics and small RNA sequencing // Wiley Interdiscip Rev. RNA. 2014. V. 5. № 2. P. 141–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1210
90. 90. Swarts D.C., Makarova K., Wang Y. et al. The evolutionary journey of Argonaute proteins // Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014. V. 21. № 9. P. 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2879
91. 91. Olina A.V., Kulbachinskiy A.V., Aravin A.A. et al. Argonaute proteins and mechanisms of RNA interference in eukaryotes and prokaryotes // Biochemistry (Moscow). 2018. V. 83. № 5. P. 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297918050024
92. 92. Lisitskaya L., Aravin A.A., Kulbachinskiy A. DNA interference and beyond: Structure and functions of prokaryotic Argonaute proteins // Nat. Commun. 2018. V. 9. № 1. P. 5165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07449-7
93. 93. Makarova K.S., Wolf Y.I., van der Oost J. et al. Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are predicted to function as key components of a novel system of defense against mobile genetic elements // Biol. Direct. 2009. V. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-4-29
94. 94. Ryazansky S., Kulbachinskiy A., Aravin A.A. The expanded universe of prokaryotic argonaute proteins // MBio. 2018. V. 9. № 6. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01935-18
95. 95. Agapov A., Panteleev V., Kropocheva E. et al. Prokaryotic Argonaute nuclease cooperates with co-encoded RNase to acquire guide RNAs and target invader DNA // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2024. V. 52. P. 5895–5911. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae345
96. 96. Hegge J.W., Swarts D.C., Chandradoss S.D. et al. DNA-guided DNA cleavage at moderate temperatures by Clostridium butyricum Argonaute // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2019. V. 47. № 11. P. 5809–5821. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz306
97. 97. Kaya E., Doxzen K.W., Knoll K.R. et al. A bacterial Argonaute with noncanonical guide RNA specificity // PNAS USA. 2016. V. 113. № 15. P. 4057–4062. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524385113
98. 98. Kuzmenko A., Yudin D., Ryazansky S. et al. Programmable DNA cleavage by Ago nucleases from mesophilic bacteria Clostridium butyricum and Limnothrix rosea // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2019. V. 47. № 11. P. 5822–5836. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz379
99. 99. Kropocheva E., Kuzmenko A., Aravin A.A. et al. A programmable pAgo nuclease with universal guide and target specificity from the mesophilic bacterium Kurthia massiliensis // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2021. V. 49. № 7. P. 4054–4065. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab182
100. 100. Liu Y., Li W., Jiang X. et al. A programmable omnipotent Argonaute nuclease from mesophilic bacteria Kurthia massiliensis // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2021. V. 49. № 3. P. 1597–1608. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1278
101. 101. Lisitskaya L., Shin Y., Agapov A. et al. Programmable RNA targeting by bacterial Argonaute nucleases with unconventional guide binding and cleavage specificity // Nat. Commun. 2022. V. 13. № 1. P. 4624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32079-5
102. 102. Li W., Liu Y., He R. et al. A programmable pAgo nuclease with RNA target preference from the psychrotolerant bacterium Mucilaginibacter paludis // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2022. V. 50. № 9. P. 5226–5238. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac315
103. 103. Swarts D.C., Hegge J.W., Hinojo I. et al. Argonaute of the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus is a DNA-guided nuclease that targets cognate DNA // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2015. V. 43. № 10. P. 5120–5129. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv415
104. 104. Swarts D.C., Jore M.M., Westra E.R. et al. DNAguided DNA interference by a prokaryotic Argonaute // Nature. 2014. V. 507. № 7491. P. 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12971
105. 105. Zander A., Willkomm S., Ofer S. et al. Guideindependent DNA cleavage by archaeal Argonaute from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii // Nat. Microbiol. 2017. V. 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.34
106. 106. Kropocheva E., Lisitskaya L., Agapov A. et al. Prokaryotic Argonaute proteins as a tool for biotechnology // Mol. Biol. 2022. V. 56. № 6. P. 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893322060103
107. 107. Enghiad B., Xue P., Singh N. et al. PlasmidMaker is a versatile, automated, and high throughput endto-end platform for plasmid construction // Nat. Commun. 2022. V. 13. № 1. P. 2697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30355-y
108. 108. Qin Y., Li Y., Hu Y. Emerging Argonaute-based nucleic acid biosensors // Trends Biotechnol. 2022. V. 40. № 8. P. 910–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.03.006
109. 109. Kuzmenko A., Oguienko A., Esyunina D. et al. DNA targeting and interference by a bacterial Argonaute nuclease // Nature. 2020. V. 587. № 7835. P. 632–637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2605-1
110. 110. Esyunina D., Okhtienko A., Olina A. et al. Specific targeting of plasmids with Argonaute enables genome editing // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2023. V. 51. № 8. P. 4086–4099. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad191
111. 111. Jolly S.M., Gainetdinov I., Jouravleva K. et al. Thermus thermophilus Argonaute functions in the completion of DNA replication // Cell. 2020. V. 182. № 6. P. 1545–1559 e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.036
112. 112. Olina A., Agapov A., Yudin D. et al. Bacterial Argonaute proteins aid cell division in the presence of tpoisomerase inhibitors in Escherichia coli // Microbiol. Spectr. 2023. V. 11. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04146-22
113. 113. Lisitskaya L., Kropocheva E., Agapov A. et al. Bacterial Argonaute nucleases reveal different modes of DNA targeting in vitro and in vivo // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2023. V. 51. № 10. P. 5106–5124. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad290
114. 114. Olovnikov I., Chan K., Sachidanandam R. et al. Bacterial argonaute samples the transcriptome to identify foreign DNA // Mol. Cell. 2013. V. 51. № 5. P. 594–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.014
115. 115. Liu Y., Esyunina D., Olovnikov I. et al. Accommodation of helical imperfections in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Argonaute ternary complexes with guide RNA and target DNA // Cell Reports. 2018. V. 24. № 2. P. 453–462.
116. 116. Miyoshi T., Ito K., Murakami R. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of guide RNA and target DNA heteroduplex by Argonaute // Nat. Commun. 2016. V. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11846
117. 117. Song X., Lei S., Liu S. et al. Catalytically inactive long prokaryotic Argonaute systems employ distinct effectors to confer immunity via abortive infection // Nat. Commun. 2023. V. 14. № 1. P. 6970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42793-3
118. 118. Manakova E., Golovinas E., Poceviciute R. et al. The missing part: The Archaeoglobus fulgidus Argonaute forms a functional heterodimer with an N-L1-L2 domain protein // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1241
119. 119. Zeng Z., Chen Y., Pinilla-Redondo R. et al. A short prokaryotic Argonaute activates membrane effector to confer antiviral defense // Cell Host Microbe. 2022. V. 30. № 7. P. 930–943 e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.015
120. 120. Loeff L., Adams D.W., Chanez C. et al. Molecular mechanism of plasmid elimination by the DdmDE defense system // Science. 2024. V. 385. № 6705. P. 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq0534
121. 121. Bravo J.P.K., Ramos D.A., Fregoso Ocampo R. et al. Plasmid targeting and destruction by the DdmDE bacterial defence system // Nature. 2024. V. 630. № 8018. P. 961–967. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07515-9
122. 122. Yang X.Y., Shen Z., Wang C. et al. DdmDE eliminates plasmid invasion by DNA-guided DNA targeting // Cell. 2024. V. 187. № 19. P. 5253–5266 e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.028
123. 123. Koopal B., Mutte S.K., Swarts D.C. A long look at short prokaryotic Argonautes // Trends Cell Biol. 2023. V. 33. № 7. P. 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2022.10.005
124. 124. Koopal B., Potocnik A., Mutte S.K. et al. Short prokaryotic Argonaute systems trigger cell death upon detection of invading DNA // Cell. 2022. V. 185. № 9. P. 1471–1486 e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.012
125. 125. Prostova M., Kanevskaya A., Panteleev V. et al. DNAtargeting short Argonautes complex with effector proteins for collateral nuclease activity and bacterial population immunity // Nat. Microbiol. 2024. V. 9. P. 1368–1381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-024-01654-5
126. 126. Lu X., Xiao J., Wang L. et al. The nuclease-associated short prokaryotic Argonaute system nonspecifically degrades DNA upon activation by target recognition // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2024. V. 52. № 2. P. 844–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1145
127. 127. Zaremba M., Dakineviciene D., Golovinas E. et al. Short prokaryotic Argonautes provide defence against incoming mobile genetic elements through NAD(+) depletion // Nat. Microbiol. 2022. V. 7. № 11. P. 1857–1869. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01239-0
128. 128. Gao X., Shang K., Zhu K. et al. Nucleic-acid-triggered NADase activation of a short prokaryotic Argonaute // Nature. 2024. V. 625. № 7996. P. 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06665-6
129. 129. Finocchio G., Koopal B., Potocnik A. et al. Target DNA-dependent activation mechanism of the prokaryotic immune system SPARTA // Nucl. Ac. Res. 2024. V. 52. P. 2012–2029. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1248
130. 130. Shen Z., Yang X.Y., Xia S. et al. Oligomerizationmediated activation of a short prokaryotic Argonaute // Nature. 2023. V. 621. № 7977. P. 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06456-z
131. 131. Cui N., Zhang J.T., Li Z. et al. Tetramerizationdependent activation of the Sir2-associated short prokaryotic Argonaute immune system // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. № 1. P. 8610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52910-5
132. 132. Kim S.Y., Jung Y., Lim D. Argonaute system of Kordia jejudonensis is a heterodimeric nucleic acid-guided nuclease // Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020. V. 525. № 3. P. 755–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.02.145
133. 133. Potocnik A., Swarts D.C. Short prokaryotic Argonaute system repurposed as a nucleic acid detection tool // Clin. Transl. Med. 2022. V. 12. № 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.1059