RAS BiologyГенетика Russian Journal of Genetics

  • ISSN (Print) 0016-6758
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5103

Genetic alterations of oral cancer associated with progression in young adults

PII
S0016675825050064-1
DOI
10.31857/S0016675825050064
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 61 / Issue number 5
Pages
67-77
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in young adults is an aggressive and rapidly progressive disease that is not correlated with traditional risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The aim of the study was to identify genetic alterations associated with early-onset OSCC progression. The study included 25 young patients with OSCC living in the Russian Federation. Whole-exome sequencing of primary tumor and peripheral blood samples was performed using the SureSelect XT v. 8.0 DNA library preparation kit on the Genolab M platform. Analysis of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions and deletions (indels) was performed using the GATK pipeline; filtering of genetic variants in the tumor relative to those in the peripheral blood was performed using the Mutect2 pipeline; mutation annotation was performed using ANNOVAR. Statistical data processing was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 computer program package. To test mutations that showed a statistically significant result in relation to relapse-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival, data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (N = 127) were used. There was revealed the prognostic significance of somatic mutations in TAF1L, CUL7, PRPS1L1, and CDKN2A genes for relapse-free survival (p = 0.003, p = 0.003, p = 0.003, and p = 0.004 respectively), PLEC, and TEP1 for metastasis-free survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007 respectively), and ADGRL3, PREX1, and CDKN2A for overall survival (p = 0.023, p = 0.023, and p < 0.001 respectively). All mutations in the CDKN2A gene were frameshift or results in a premature termination codon, one patient was found to have a pathogenic variant rs121913387. For the CUL7 gene, the variant rs369167170 was recurrent in patients with relapses, and for the PLEC gene, the variant in the region 7:18027430 C>A was recurrent in patients with metastases. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data confirmed the association of only CDKN2A mutations with OSCC progression at the age of 45 years (N = 18, p = 0.049), but not in older patients (N = 109). This work revealed genetic alterations associated with the progression of early-onset OSCC, which require confirmation of their significance in a larger sample of patients and an assessment of their functional significance.
Keywords
рак полости рта молодой возраст прогрессирование рецидив мутация секвенирование
Date of publication
06.11.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
54

References

  1. 1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries // CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018. V. 68. № 6. P. 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
  2. 2. Sarode G., Maniyar N., Sarode S.C. et al. Epidemiologic aspects of oral cancer // Dis. Mon. 2020. V. 66. № 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2020.100988
  3. 3. Kolegova E.S., Patysheva M.R., Larionova I.V. et al. Early-onset oral cancer as a clinical entity: aetiology and pathogenesis // Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022. V. 51. № 12. P. 1497–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.04.005
  4. 4. Ryu H.J., Kim E.K., Cho B.C., Yoon S.O. Characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma arising in young patients: Particular focus on molecular alteration and tumor immunity // Head Neck. 2019. V. 41. № 1. P. 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25507
  5. 5. Campbell B.R., Sanders C.B., Netterville J.L. et al. Early onset oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Associated factors and patient outcomes // Head Neck. 2019. V. 41. № 6. P. 1952–1960. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25650
  6. 6. Mohideen K., Krithika C., Jeddy N. et al. Meta-analysis on risk factors of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue in young adults // J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2019. V. 23. № 3. P. 450–457. https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp
  7. 7. Braakhuis B.J., Rietbergen M.M., Buijze M. et al. TP53 mutation and human papilloma virus status of oral squamous cell carcinomas in young adult patients // Oral Dis. 2014. V. 20. № 6. P. 602–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12178
  8. 8. Rushatamukayanunt P., Morita K., Matsukawa S. et al. Lack of association between high-risk human papilloma viruses and oral squamous cell carcinoma in young Japanese patients // Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014. V. 15. № 10. P. 4135–4141. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.10.4135
  9. 9. Weckx A., Riekert M., Grandoch A. et al. Time to recurrence and patient survival in recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma // Oral Oncol. 2019. V. 94. P. 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.002
  10. 10. Safi A.F., Kauke M., Grandoch A. et al. Analysis of clinicopathological risk factors for locoregional recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma – retrospective analysis of 517 patients // J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2017. V. 45. № 10. P. 1749–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.012
  11. 11. Sorensen D.M., Lewark T.M., Haney J.L. et al. Absence of p53 mutations in squamous carcinomas of the tongue in nonsmoking and nondrinking patients younger than 40 years // Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1997. V. 123. № 5. P. 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900050051006
  12. 12. Pickering C.R., Zhang J., Neskey D.M. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue in young non-smokers is genomically similar to tumors in older smokers // Clin. Cancer Res. 2014. V. 20. № 14. P. 3842–3848. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0565
  13. 13. Lindenbergh-van der Plas M., Brakenhoff R.H., Kuik D.J. et al. Prognostic significance of truncating TP53 mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma // Clin. Cancer Res. 2011. V. 17. № 11. P. 3733–3741. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0183
  14. 14. Zhou C., Shen Z., Ye D. et al. The association and clinical significance of CDKN2A promoter methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis // Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018. V. 50. № 3. P. 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494473
  15. 15. Vettore A.L., Ramnarayanan K., Poore G. et al. Mutational landscapes of tongue carcinoma reveal recurrent mutations in genes of therapeutic and prognostic relevance // Genome Med. 2015. V. 7. № 1. P. 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-015-0219-2
  16. 16. Nakagaki T., Tamura M., Kobashi K. et al. Profiling cancer-related gene mutations in oral squamous cell carcinoma from Japanese patients by targeted amplicon sequencing // Oncotarget. 2017. V. 8. № 35. P. 59113–59122. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19262
  17. 17. Zhang L., Zeng M., Fu B.M. Inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide synthase decreases breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231 adhesion to intact microvessels under physiological flows // Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016. V. 310. № 11. P. H1735–1747. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00109.2016
  18. 18. Chen W.S., Bindra R.S., Mo A. et al. CDKN2A copy number loss is an independent prognostic factor in HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma // Front. Oncol. 2018. V. 8. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00095
  19. 19. Fan K., Dong Y., Li T., Li Y. Cuproptosis-associated CDKN2A is targeted by plicamycin to regulate the microenvironment in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma // Front. Genet. 2022. V. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1036408
  20. 20. Pickering C.R., Zhang J., Neskey D.M. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue in young non-smokers is genomically similar to tumors in older smokers // Clin. Cancer Res. 2014. V. 20. № 14. P. 3842–3848. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432
  21. 21. Paderno A., Morello R., Piazza C. Tongue carcinoma in young adults: A review of the literature // Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2018. V. 38. № 3. P. 175–180. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-1932
  22. 22. Kimura J., Nguyen S.T., Liu H. et al. A functional genome-wide RNAi screen identifies TAF1 as a regulator for apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress // Nucl. Acids Res. 2008. V. 36. № 16. P. 5250–5259. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn506
  23. 23. Gao K., Gao Z., Xia M. et al. Role of plectin and its interacting molecules in cancer // Med. Oncol. 2023. V. 40. № 10. P. 280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-023-02132-4
  24. 24. Pan Z.Q. Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase 7 in growth control and cancer // Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020. V. 1217. P. 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1025-0_17
  25. 25. Xu J., Zhang Z., Qian M. et al. Cullin-7 (CUL7) is overexpressed in glioma cells and promotes tumorigenesis via NF-κB activation // J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020. V. 39. № 1. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-020-01553-7
  26. 26. Jin D.H., Kim S., Kim D.H., Park J. Two genetic variants in telomerase-associated protein 1 are associated with stomach cancer risk // J. Hum. Genet. 2016. V. 61. № 10. P. 885–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2016.71
  27. 27. Gu C., Li Q., Zhu Y. et al. Genetic variants in the TEP1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk and recurrence // Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015. V. 18. № 4. P. 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2015.27
  28. 28. Avila-Zozaya M., Rodríguez-Hernández B., Monterrubio-Ledezma F. et al. Thwarting of lphn3 functions in cell motility and signaling by cancer-related GAIN domain somatic mutations // Cells. 2022. V. 11. № 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11121913
  29. 29. Zhang H., Okuyama H., Jain A. et al. PREX1 improves homeostatic proliferation to maintain a naive CD4+ T cell compartment in older age // JCI Insight. 2024. V. 9. № 5. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.172848
  30. 30. Wan S.C., Wu H., Li H. et al. Overexpression of PREX1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma indicates poor prognosis // J. Mol. Histol. 2020. V. 51. № 5. P. 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10735-020-09901-9
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library